Search or filter publications

Filter by type:

Filter by publication type

Filter by year:

to

Results

  • Showing results for:
  • Reset all filters

Search results

  • Conference paper
    Cawley P, 2012,

    BRUCE THOMPSON - INTERNATIONAL LEADER

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 99-100, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Ribichini R, Cegla F, Nagy PB, Cawley Pet al., 2012,

    ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT EMAT CONFIGURATIONS FOR SHEAR HORIZONTAL AND TORSIONAL WAVES

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 955-962, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Ptaszek G, Cawley P, Almond D, Pickering Set al., 2012,

    ARTIFICIAL DISBONDS FOR CALIBRATION OF TRANSIENT THERMOGRAPHY INSPECTION OF THERMAL BARRIER COATING SYSTEMS

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 491-498, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Journal article
    Jackson MD, Leinov E, 2012,

    On the Validity of the “Thin” and “Thick”Double-Layer Assumptions When CalculatingStreaming Currents in Porous Media

    , International Journal of Geophysics, Vol: 2012, ISSN: 1687-8868

    We find that the thin double layer assumption, in which the thickness of the electrical diffuse layer is assumed small comparedto the radius of curvature of a pore or throat, is valid in a capillary tubes model so long as the capillary radius is >200 times thedouble layer thickness, while the thick double layer assumption, in which the diffuse layer is assumed to extend across the entirepore or throat, is valid so long as the capillary radius is >6 times smaller than the double layer thickness. At low surface chargedensity (<10 mC · m−2) or high electrolyte concentration (>0.5 M) the validity criteria are less stringent. Our results suggest thatthe thin double layer assumption is valid in sandstones at low specific surface charge (<10 mC · m−2), but may not be valid insandstones of moderate- to small pore-throat size at higher surface charge if the brine concentration is low (<0.001 M). The thickdouble layer assumption is likely to be valid in mudstones at low brine concentration (<0.1 M) and surface charge (<10 mC·m−2),but at higher surface charge, it is likely to be valid only at low brine concentration (<0.003 M). Consequently, neither assumptionmay be valid in mudstones saturated with natural brines.

  • Journal article
    Rajagopal P, Drozdz M, Skelton E, Lowe MJS, Craster RVet al., 2012,

    On the use of absorbing layers to simulate the propagation of elastic waves in unbounded isotropic media using commercially available Finite Element packages

    , NDT and E International, Vol: TBC
  • Conference paper
    Galvagni A, Cawley P, 2012,

    A Permanently Installed Guided Wave System for Pipe Monitoring

    , Conference on Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems, Publisher: SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING, ISSN: 0277-786X
  • Journal article
    Rajagopal P, Skelton EA, Choi W, Lowe MJS, Craster RVet al., 2012,

    A generic hybrid model for bulk elastodynamics, with application to ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation

    , IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, Vol: 59, Pages: 1239-TBC
  • Journal article
    Jones RE, Simonetti F, Lowe MJS, 2012,

    Use of microwaves for the detection of water as a cause of corrosion under insulation

    , Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol: 31, Pages: 65-76
  • Journal article
    Jackson MD, Gulamali MY, Leinov E, Saunders JH, Vinogradov Jet al., 2012,

    Spontaneous Potentials in Hydrocarbon Reservoirs during Waterflooding: Application to Waterfront Monitoring

    , SPE Journal
  • Conference paper
    Brierley N, Tippetts T, Cawley P, 2012,

    IMPROVING THE RELIABILITY OF AUTOMATED NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 1824-1831, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Journal article
    Milne K, Cawley P, Nagy PB, Wright DC, Dunhill Aet al., 2011,

    Ultrasonic Non-destructive Evaluation of Titanium Diffusion Bonds

    , JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, Vol: 30, Pages: 225-236, ISSN: 0195-9298
  • Journal article
    Xi X, Cegla FB, Lowe M, Thiemann A, Nowak T, Mettin R, Holsteyns F, Lippert Aet al., 2011,

    Study on the bubble transport mechanism in an acoustic standing wave field

    , ULTRASONICS, Vol: 51, Pages: 1014-1025, ISSN: 0041-624X
  • Journal article
    Ribichini R, Cegla F, Nagy PB, Cawley Pet al., 2011,

    Study and Comparison of Different EMAT Configurations for SH Wave Inspection

    , IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, Vol: 58, Pages: 2571-2581, ISSN: 0885-3010
  • Journal article
    Lovstad A, Cawley P, 2011,

    The reflection of the fundamental torsional guided wave from multiple circular holes in pipes

    , NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, Vol: 44, Pages: 553-562, ISSN: 0963-8695
  • Journal article
    Huthwaite P, Simonetti F, 2011,

    High-resolution imaging without iteration: A fast and robust method for breast ultrasound tomography

    , JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, Vol: 130, Pages: 1721-1734, ISSN: 0001-4966
  • Journal article
    Gulamali MY, Leinov E, Jackson MD, 2011,

    Self-potential anomalies induced by water injection into hydrocarbon reservoirs

    , Geophysics, Vol: 76, Pages: F283-F292, ISSN: 1942-2156

    The injection of cold water into a hydrocarbon reservoir containingrelatively warmer, more saline formation brine may generateself-potential anomalies as a result of electrokinetic,thermoelectric, and=or electrochemical effects. We havenumerically assessed the relative contributions of these effectsto the overall self-potential signal generated during oil productionin a simple hydrocarbon reservoir model. Our aim was todetermine if measurements of self-potential at a production wellcan be used to detect the movement of water toward the well.The coupling coefficients for the electrochemical and thermoelectricpotentials are uncertain, so we considered four differentmodels for them. We also investigated the effect of altering thesalinities of the formation and injected brines. We found thatthe electrokinetic potential peaked at the location of the saturationfront (reaching values of 0.2 mV even for the most salinebrine considered). Moreover, the value at the production wellincreased as the front approached the well, exceeding the noiselevel ( 0.1 mV). Thermoelectric effects gave rise to largerpotentials in the reservoir (10 mV), but values at the wellwere negligible ð Þ .0:1 mV until after water breakthroughbecause of the lag in the temperature front relative to the saturationfront. Electrochemical potentials were smaller in magnitudethan thermoelectric potentials in the reservoir but were measurableð Þ > 0:1 mV at the well because the salinity front wasclosely associated with the saturation front. When the formationbrine was less saline (1 mol=liter), electrokinetic effects dominated;at higher salinities (5 mol=liter), electrochemicaleffects were significant. We concluded that the measurement ofself-potential signals in a production well may be used to monitorthe movement of water in hydrocarbon reservoirs duringproduction, but further research is required to understand thethermoelectric and electrochemical coupling coefficients in partiallysatu

  • Journal article
    Clarke T, Cawley P, 2011,

    Enhancing the defect localization capability of a guided wave SHM system applied to a complex structure

    , STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, Vol: 10, Pages: 247-259, ISSN: 1475-9217
  • Journal article
    Galvagni A, Cawley P, 2011,

    The reflection of guided waves from simple supports in pipes

    , JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, Vol: 129, Pages: 1869-1880, ISSN: 0001-4966
  • Conference paper
    Duxbury D, Lowe M, Russell J, 2011,

    Effects of variation in phased array element performance

    When phased array probes are used for ultrasonic inspection it is necessary to ensure that consistent performance is achieved. If Full Matrix Capture (FMC) is used to record inspection data the most appropriate way of doing this is to assess transducer performance on an element by element basis rather than assess a specific beam.The rationale for this approach is that any beam can be synthetically produced from FMC data, so it is not logical to couple probe calibration with a particular beam. This paper presents a model based study that aims to place specifications on element performance. The effect of element sensitivity, phase, and non-functioning elements has been investigated using an array beam model, based on Huygen's principle, to carry out Monte Carlo simulations. This has revealed that the dominant result of variations in element performance is the introduction of beam artefacts, such as the creation of side lobes. Results will be presented from simulations of a number of beam types at several centre frequencies that show that focused beams are more resistant to artefacts than plane beams, and the effect of element phase is dependant on probe bandwidth. General guidelines for acceptable variations between elements will also be presented. © (2011) by the British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing. All rights reserved.

  • Journal article
    Lowe M, Saffari N, Lhemery A, Deschamps M, Leger A, Abrahams Det al., 2011,

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series: Preface

    , Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol: 269, ISSN: 1742-6588

This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.

Request URL: http://www.imperial.ac.uk:80/respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-t4-html.jsp Request URI: /respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-t4-html.jsp Query String: id=388&limit=20&page=13&respub-action=search.html Current Millis: 1788002489086 Current Time: Sat Aug 29 12:21:29 BST 2026